The Turnover You Do Not See Costing You

Business professionals collaborating to reduce employee turnover

What losing your best people is really doing to your bottom line, even when the exit interview sounds routine

By David Norman, CMC®

Published for Business Owners | highcountrypg.net

Every business owner has had this moment. A good employee gives notice. The conversation is polite. Maybe the employee got a better offer. Maybe it was time for a change. You wish that person well, post the job opening, and move on.

Here is what usually does not happen in that moment. Nobody calculates what that departure cost.

The Work Institute's research puts the cost of preventable turnover at roughly $750,000 per year for every 1,000 employees in an organization. Scale that down to your business, and the number is still real. It still hurts. And it is still, in large part, preventable.

Why Turnover Costs More Than You Think

The visible costs are the ones most owners already account for. Recruiting. Advertising the role. The hours spent interviewing. The training period for a new hire. Those add up fast, but they are only part of the picture.

The bigger cost is harder to see. Research on turnover cost structure has found that hidden costs make up roughly 60 percent of the total financial impact of a departure, well beyond what shows up on a recruiting invoice. Part of that hidden cost is knowledge loss. Research on employee expertise has found that a significant share of what an experienced employee knows, close to 42 percent by some estimates, is unique and cannot be transferred through a manual or a training session.

Think about what a team member with five or eight years of tenure carries. The judgment about which customers need careful handling. The relationships built over years. The pattern recognition that comes only from having lived through your business's ups and downs.

When that person leaves, you can hire someone with a similar resume. You cannot hire their experience. Research from the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) puts the average time to reach full productivity for a replacement at around six months. During that stretch, you are effectively paying two costs at once. One salary to the new hire who is still learning, and one in lost output, mistakes, and slower service.

The Compounding Effect

Turnover rarely stays contained to one person. When a valued employee leaves, the people around that employee notice. They ask why. If the answer points to poor management, unclear direction, or a culture that felt more transactional than genuine, that same dissatisfaction is likely sitting in other members of your team, waiting.

This is why turnover in a people-first business looks fundamentally different from turnover in a systems-first business. In a people-first business, departures are the exception. In a business that has optimized for process and metrics but neglected the human environment, turnover becomes background noise. Owners start to normalize it. “That is just this industry” becomes the explanation, when the real explanation is closer to home.

What You Can Actually Do About It

You do not need a large HR department to reduce preventable turnover. You need honest answers to a few direct questions.

  • Do your best people trust their direct supervisor? Not just tolerate that person. Trust them.

  • Do people feel they can raise a concern without it costing them something? 

  • Is growth in your business real, or is it a talking point in the job posting? 

None of these questions require new software. They require you to look honestly at how people are actually led day to day, and to be willing to change what you find.

The Math Worth Doing This Week

Take your current voluntary turnover rate. Multiply it by a conservative estimate of what each departure costs, once you include the six months of reduced productivity and the knowledge that walked out the door. Then ask yourself what a 20 to 30 percent reduction in that number would mean for your business this year.

That number is usually large enough to change how an owner thinks about culture. It stops being a soft concern and starts looking like what it is: one of the most direct financial levers available to you.

Sources: Work Institute, 2023 Retention Report. Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), turnover cost analysis, 2022.


David Norman works with business leaders who are ready to build organizations capable of performing not just when conditions cooperate but especially when they do not. His books Supercharge: A New Playbook for Leadership and Accountability Shift: Tips, Traps, and Techniques are available now. Subscribe to his newsletter at Substack.com, currently free for early subscribers.

Next
Next

The Money Is in Your People, Not Your Playbook